U.S.
may have to include itself in 'travel warnings'
Andres
Oppenheimer*
Latin America correspondent for the Miami Herald
Article Last Updated:
04/19/2007 07:38:17 PM MDT
The
unprecedented killing spree that left 33 dead, including
the deranged gunman, at Virginia Tech this week makes me
wonder whether it's time for the U.S. State Department to
scrap its travel warnings about countries that it deems
too dangerous for Americans to visit.
It's
not only a list that is seen abroad as a symbol of U.S.
hypocrisy, but it's become ridiculous in the wake of
9/11 or Virginia Tech. Some of the capitals on the U.S.
''off-limits'' list have not seen incidents of violence
of this magnitude in recent years.
Hours
after the Virginia Tech killings, I looked at the State
Department's Web site to see its latest travel advisories.
It includes both ''travel warnings'' that are issued ''when
the State Department recommends that Americans avoid a certain
country,'' and ''consular information sheets,'' which report
about crime and other potential threats to U.S. citizens
around the world.
Under
the list of countries the State Department recommends Americans
avoid altogether are Israel, Haiti and Colombia. In the
case of Colombia, it says that ''citizens of the United
States and other countries continue to be victims of threats,
kidnappings and other criminal acts,'' even though ''violence
in recent years has decreased markedly in most urban areas,
including Bogota, Medellin, Barranquilla and Cartagena.''
In
the case of Israel, it says that there is a continuing threat
of suicide bombings. ''The January 2006 and April 2006 suicide
bombings in Tel Aviv, the December 2005 suicide bombing
in Netanya and a similar incident in Hadera in October 2005
are reminders of the precarious security environment,''
it says.
But
it so happens that this week's killings at Virginia Tech
were as deadly as the worst recent incidents of violence
in Colombia or Israel.
In
Colombia, the deadliest attack in recent years was the February
2003 car bomb that destroyed the posh social club El Nogal
in Bogota. It left a toll of 26 dead on the night of the
explosion, although the death toll rose to 33 in the weeks
that followed.
In
Israel, none of the suicide bombings referred to in the
latest State Department advisory reached the death toll
we saw this week in Virginia. Among the worst recent mass
killings in Israel were October 2004 attacks on two Sinai
holiday resorts, which left 32 dead.
Earlier
this week, Colombia's Vice President Francisco Santos told
me that the U.S. travel advisories are seen as an oddity
abroad. He noted that, ironically, many people in Latin
America see the United States as an unsafe country where
terrorists killed nearly 3,000 people on Sept. 11, 2001,
and where deranged gunmen - with the help of permissive
gun laws - periodically carry out mass killings.
''These
advisories cause a terrible damage to our countries, and
are totally inflexible,'' Santos said. ''In addition, they
create political resentment against the United States.''
Santos
said the U.S. travel warnings are also misleading: Colombia's
capital has dramatically reduced its crime rates, to the
point that it is lower than Washington's, he said.
Colombia
reports 24 homicides per 100,000 people in Bogota in 2005,
while the FBI's latest report lists 35 homicides per 100,000
people in Washington that year.
State
Department Bureau of Consular Affairs spokesman Steve Royster
told me that several other countries, including Great Britain
and Canada, also issue foreign travel advisories.
The
practice is part of the U.S. government's mission to ''further
our highest objective in our post overseas, which is to
provide for the safety of U.S. citizens abroad,'' he said.
Does
it make sense for the United States to warn Americans not
to travel to countries whose capitals are as safe - or unsafe
- as major U.S. cities?
Furthermore,
does it make sense for the U.S. government to spend billions
in economic aid to friendly countries such as Colombia and
Israel, and at the same time shoot down their tourism industries?
I
don't think so. Travel advisories are a good idea, but they
should be left for non government organizations. Ideally,
America should once and for all begin to strictly control
gun sales.
In
addition, the State Department should ditch its travel advisory
- or include the United States among the countries that
are too dangerous to visit.
* ANDRES OPPENHEIMER Andres Oppenheimer is a Latin America
correspondent for the Miami Herald, 1 Herald Plaza, Miami,
Fla. 33132; e-mail: aoppenheimer@miamiherald.com. |